Difference between revisions of "languages for learning programming"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Links: Shlomi Fish article) |
(→Resources: Hackety Hack) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
==Resources== | ==Resources== | ||
* [http://www.quitebasic.com/ QuiteBasic]: BASIC on the web; created in response to [[David Brin]]'s "Why Johnny Can't Code" article | * [http://www.quitebasic.com/ QuiteBasic]: BASIC on the web; created in response to [[David Brin]]'s "Why Johnny Can't Code" article | ||
| + | * [http://hacketyhack.net/ Hackety Hack]: tutorial aimed at 13 and up, teaches how to write your own [[blog]] software in a handful of minutes | ||
| + | |||
==Languages for Kids== | ==Languages for Kids== | ||
* [http://www.alice.org/ Alice] | * [http://www.alice.org/ Alice] | ||
Revision as of 01:52, 15 May 2007
computing: software: programming: languages: for learning
Related Pages
- Flawed as it is, BASIC remains the classic "language for teaching programming" (especially for kids); several free, full-featured versions are now available (some with source code).
Overview
There is a need for a programming language and environment that is suitable for teaching beginners – including children – to program.
Some key features:
- (Ideally) Available pre-installed on all popular OSs; next-best would be availability for free on the internet, in versions pre-compiled for all popular OSs
- BASIC-like in certain ways:
- must have an "interactive" mode, where you type a line and the computer immediately executes your instructions
- must have simple graphics ability readily available (where "readily" can be defined as "you can plot a pixel in a single line of code, where lines which include external libraries count as additional lines of code")
- simple, non-picky syntax (syntax error messages should be informative and on-target, to reduce the learning curve)
This need has been brought up in different contexts and discussed a fair amount; for now, I'm just going to post some links. --Woozle 21:27, 14 September 2006 (EDT)
See also Wikipedia's Educational Programming Languages page, which has a few more choices than mentioned below.
Resources
- QuiteBasic: BASIC on the web; created in response to David Brin's "Why Johnny Can't Code" article
- Hackety Hack: tutorial aimed at 13 and up, teaches how to write your own blog software in a handful of minutes
Languages for Kids
- Alice
- BASIC-256 (formerly KidBASIC), also inspired by "Why Johnny Can't Code"
- Logo
- references: CS for Kids
- Python
- references: Python for Educators | Python: A Multimedia Approach | Python Bibliography | PyroLiveCD
- Ruby
- Scheme
- references: Dr. Scheme | How to Design Programs | Teach Scheme Project
- Squeak Smalltalk
- references: Squeakland | FreeDuc LiveCD with Squeak
Links
- 2003-10-14 Teaching Kids to Program by Joshua Marin
- 2005-2-20 Teaching My Kids to Program by Don Box
- discussion: lambda the ultimate
- 2005-2-26 It's Down to Scheme or Logo by Don Box
- 2006-09-14 Why Johnny can't code by David Brin
- discussion: |slashdot| |Contrary Brin|: the latter includes a suggestion to use Python in a particular configuration; perhaps this configuration could be preconfigured and packaged?
- Thoughts about the Best Introductory Language by Shlomi Fish: list of fallacies, with a final opinion. Creative Commons license.
- A Very Quick Comparison of Popular Languages for Teaching Computer Programming
- Kid's Programming Language: free, but requires Microsoft Windows
- Phrogram: free version; also a commercial version that supports add-in libraries, requires Microsoft Windows, same team that created Kid's Programming Language
- Commodore 64 emulator (eventually, create Commodore 64 emulators page and link with emulators)