Microsoft: Difference between revisions

from HTYP, the free directory anyone can edit if they can prove to me that they're not a spambot
No edit summary
a bit of tidying
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Overview==
==Overview==
[[category:businesses]]{{seed}}
[[category:business]]{{seed}}
===Pages===
===Pages===
* [[/software]]: Microsoft's [[software]] products
* [[/software/]]: Microsoft's [[software]] products
** [[/Windows/]]
** [[/Office/]]
*** [[/Access/]]
*** [[/Word/]]
*** [[/Excel/]]
*** [[/PowerPoint/]]
* [[outlook.com]]: Microsoft's email service
* [[outlook.com]]: Microsoft's email service
==Links==
==Links==
===Reference===
===Reference===
* {{wikipedia|Microsoft}}
* {{wikipedia}}
* [http://microsoft.com official]
* [http://microsoft.com official]
===Analysis===
===Analysis===

Latest revision as of 21:07, 22 January 2026

Overview

  1. redirect Template:seed

Pages

Reference

Analysis

  • 2007-01-29 Standard Bearers: "...Microsoft not only has the audacity to produce a music standard that isn't compatible with the most popular player on the market and call it "PlaysForSure", but they then fail to make it compatible with their own player. So assuming that (despite being a piece of crap) the Zune makes it to number 2 in the market by riding on the back of the Microsoft brand (and no doubt some FUD put out to confuse PC users into thinking that iPods don't work on Windows or something), then at that point it will be the case that PlaysForSure is in fact unsupported on the top 2 most popular players, which together will probably occupy something like 90% of the music market." ...although the actual meat of the article exposes much significant evilness than this.

Template:Links/news

to file

  • 2007-09-14 Microsoft's big day in court "A nine-year battle between Microsoft and European antitrust regulators comes to a head Monday, but the
  1. redirect Template:instate giant isn't the one with the most at stake, writes Fortune's Jon Fortt."

Commentary

Documents