ironically-named subdivisions: Difference between revisions
from HTYP, the free directory anyone can edit if they can prove to me that they're not a spambot
Created page with '==About== Developers of new suburban subdivisions seem to have a habit of naming their developments after some feature (usually natural) which was removed in order to mak…' |
→Examples: AGF links now on AGF page |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Examples== | ==Examples== | ||
* [[US/NC/Durham/Everwood|Everwood subdivision]] (in [[Durham, NC] | * [[Alexan Garrett Farms]]: | ||
** This development was named after the [[issuepedia:Clifton and Leah Garrett Farm|working farm]] which formerly occupied the site, knocked down by the developer (who showed no interest in preserving it). | |||
* [[US/NC/Durham/Everwood|Everwood subdivision]] (in [[Durham, NC]]): | |||
** the site had indeed been "ever wooded" -- until the developer's [[clearcut]]ting to make room for houses and roads (currently mostly vacant due to the 2009 recession) | ** the site had indeed been "ever wooded" -- until the developer's [[clearcut]]ting to make room for houses and roads (currently mostly vacant due to the 2009 recession) | ||
** the web site name (everwoodatlast.com) is doubly ironic -- it implies that the area was unwooded until the developer ''finally arrived'' (at last!) to put trees there, now safe for all future generations to walk through and enjoy; this of course is the reverse of the truth. | ** the web site name (everwoodatlast.com) is doubly ironic -- it implies that the area was unwooded until the developer ''finally arrived'' (at last!) to put trees there, now safe for all future generations to walk through and enjoy; this of course is the reverse of the truth. | ||
* [[The Forest at Duke]], a [[Durham, NC]] retirement community built in the 1990s | |||
** The naming here isn't as ''intensely'' ironic, as this community was built on a lot which had already been cleared by a different developer for a commercial project (something like "Chesterfield") which failed with a few houses built. By the time TFaD began construction, the lot was thickly covered with new growth (mostly pine) well on its way to foresthood. | |||
''need more examples'' | ''need more examples!'' | ||
Latest revision as of 11:13, 8 October 2011
About
Developers of new suburban subdivisions seem to have a habit of naming their developments after some feature (usually natural) which was removed in order to make way for the development. This probably unintentional, but certainly ironic.
Examples
- Alexan Garrett Farms:
- This development was named after the working farm which formerly occupied the site, knocked down by the developer (who showed no interest in preserving it).
- Everwood subdivision (in Durham, NC):
- the site had indeed been "ever wooded" -- until the developer's clearcutting to make room for houses and roads (currently mostly vacant due to the 2009 recession)
- the web site name (everwoodatlast.com) is doubly ironic -- it implies that the area was unwooded until the developer finally arrived (at last!) to put trees there, now safe for all future generations to walk through and enjoy; this of course is the reverse of the truth.
- The Forest at Duke, a Durham, NC retirement community built in the 1990s
- The naming here isn't as intensely ironic, as this community was built on a lot which had already been cleared by a different developer for a commercial project (something like "Chesterfield") which failed with a few houses built. By the time TFaD began construction, the lot was thickly covered with new growth (mostly pine) well on its way to foresthood.
need more examples!
