Difference between revisions of "web development/WYSIWYG"

from HTYP, the free directory anyone can edit if they can prove to me that they're not a spambot
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "==About== One ongoing challenge for web developers has been to provide full what you see is what you get editing capabilities on a web site, preferably implemented...")
 
(→‎not evaluated: interesting typo there...)
 
Line 15: Line 15:
 
* [[mwsite:Extension:MeanEditor|MeanEditor]] - not ''quite'' WYSIWYG, but still preserves coloring, indentation, and centering
 
* [[mwsite:Extension:MeanEditor|MeanEditor]] - not ''quite'' WYSIWYG, but still preserves coloring, indentation, and centering
 
===not evaluated===
 
===not evaluated===
* [[mwsite:Extension:WikEd|WikEd]]: graphical but not necessarily WikEd; couldn't find a demo page
+
* [[mwsite:Extension:WikEd|WikEd]]: graphical but not necessarily WYSIWYG; couldn't find a demo page

Latest revision as of 14:26, 5 April 2012

About

One ongoing challenge for web developers has been to provide full what you see is what you get editing capabilities on a web site, preferably implemented in open source code.

Google Docs is one closed source but otherwise successful solution, showing that it can be done.

Projects

Each of the following were tested by pasting the contents of a document from LibreOffice 3.0. The document contained one embedded image.

  • CKEditor - maintains most formatting (including coloring and indentation), but loses centering and images
  • TinyMCE - preserves coloring and indentation, but not centering or images
  • Visual editor - preserves only text; loses all formatting
    • this extension is still under development, so the pasting may be improved later
  • MeanEditor - not quite WYSIWYG, but still preserves coloring, indentation, and centering

not evaluated

  • WikEd: graphical but not necessarily WYSIWYG; couldn't find a demo page