Hubzilla/WebTorrent/server: Difference between revisions

from HTYP, the free directory anyone can edit if they can prove to me that they're not a spambot
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Hubzilla]] extensions for serving [[../|WebTorrents]] include:
[[Hubzilla]] extensions for serving [[../|WebTorrents]] include:


* BitTorrent Server: [https://github.com/roere/bittorrentserver/tree/master GitHub] v0.2 alpha, as of 2017-09-08
* '''BitTorrent Server''': [https://github.com/roere/bittorrentserver/tree/master GitHub] v0.2 alpha, as of 2017-09-08
** Although labeled as a "BitTorrent" server, the GitHub documentation states that "The idea behind this plugin was to use Webtorrents in Hubzilla. Libtorrent does not support Webtorrent yet, also it is planned since quite some time: https://github.com/arvidn/libtorrent/issues/223"
** Although labeled only as a "BitTorrent" server, the GitHub documentation states that "The idea behind this plugin was to use Webtorrents in Hubzilla. Libtorrent does not support Webtorrent yet, also it is planned since quite some time: https://github.com/arvidn/libtorrent/issues/223"


So the serving of WT may be the bottleneck. (Surely the [[WebTorrent]] software itself can be adapted somehow?)
So the serving of WT may be the bottleneck. (Surely the [[WebTorrent]] software itself can be adapted somehow?)

Latest revision as of 08:33, 9 September 2017

Hubzilla extensions for serving WebTorrents include:

  • BitTorrent Server: GitHub v0.2 alpha, as of 2017-09-08
    • Although labeled only as a "BitTorrent" server, the GitHub documentation states that "The idea behind this plugin was to use Webtorrents in Hubzilla. Libtorrent does not support Webtorrent yet, also it is planned since quite some time: https://github.com/arvidn/libtorrent/issues/223"

So the serving of WT may be the bottleneck. (Surely the WebTorrent software itself can be adapted somehow?)