Difference between revisions of "Talk:dollar a gallon gasoline"
Mattbrowne (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
[http://www.meet-matt-browne.com www.meet-matt-browne.com]<br> | [http://www.meet-matt-browne.com www.meet-matt-browne.com]<br> | ||
and fellow Lifeboat member | and fellow Lifeboat member | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Hi Matt. The answer is a conditional yes to the photosynthesis question. Plants are less than 1% efficient in capturing energy. They do have the advantage that they grow from seeds and present a lot of surface area to capture carbon dioxide. Eventually we should be able to sell seeds for gasoline trees that you can plant next to your driveway, but not yet. | ||
+ | |||
+ | To put numbers on it, solar panels are certainly more than ten times as efficient as plants. Even the problems of making electricity into gasoline should not be worse than 50%. The other matter is that solar panels in space don't use any land and the rectennas don't block much sunlight so they can go over farmland. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[User:Hkhenson|Hkhenson]] 14:45, 15 September 2008 (EDT) |
Revision as of 18:45, 15 September 2008
I can sure use help--both with the English and with the models/math.
Hkhenson 22:55, 28 July 2008 (EDT)
Hi Keith!
I see your new pages and I haven't had time to read them properly yet -- looking forward to it, as this is a topic which interests me greatly. I'll add crosslinks etc. as they occur to me.
For linking to other pages in the wiki, use this form: Hundred dollars a kg or a page about getting gas down to $100/kg. If the page doesn't exist, the link will show up in red. (Yeah, I need to put this on the editing help page, and probably a lot of other stuff.)
I've linked to this article from Issuepedia's oil addiction page.
Cheers! --Woozle 19:32, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
Contact data for Keith Henson
hkhensonspam@spamrogersspam.spamcom 626-264-7560 (cell)
BTW, This work is not all mine. There are other people involved, but some of them don't want their names public about it yet.
Hkhenson 11:00, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
Hello Keith,
Very interesting and promising concept! One key question remains: when will man-made solar panels used for creating synthetic gasoline surpass the efficiency of plant-based photosynthesis?
Greetings,
Matt Browne
Science Fiction Author
www.meet-matt-browne.com
and fellow Lifeboat member
Hi Matt. The answer is a conditional yes to the photosynthesis question. Plants are less than 1% efficient in capturing energy. They do have the advantage that they grow from seeds and present a lot of surface area to capture carbon dioxide. Eventually we should be able to sell seeds for gasoline trees that you can plant next to your driveway, but not yet.
To put numbers on it, solar panels are certainly more than ten times as efficient as plants. Even the problems of making electricity into gasoline should not be worse than 50%. The other matter is that solar panels in space don't use any land and the rectennas don't block much sunlight so they can go over farmland.
Hkhenson 14:45, 15 September 2008 (EDT)