Difference between revisions of "debate mapping"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Arguman) |
(Agora; intro; improved formatting) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | <hide> | ||
| + | [[page type::article]] | ||
| + | [[thing type::technique]] | ||
| + | </hide> | ||
| + | ==About== | ||
| + | '''Debate mapping''' is an information management technique for keeping track of the structure of evidence and arguments in support of making the best determination about the truth or falsity of one or more statements. Although in theory this could be done using only paper or a manual filing system, it is far more effective when computers can be used to [[/status tracking|keep track of the current status]] of each statement, and when networks can be used to facilitate participation by multiple individuals. | ||
{{seed}} | {{seed}} | ||
==Software== | ==Software== | ||
| − | + | ||
| + | Note that many of these are just "debate software"; "debate mapping software" is a particular kind of debate software which includes, at a minimum, the "Tree" and "LogProp" features. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Blank cells indicate that we have not yet researched the project sufficiently to determine whether a feature is supported. | ||
Feature key: | Feature key: | ||
| Line 12: | Line 21: | ||
* UC = under construction | * UC = under construction | ||
| − | + | {| border=1 style="border: 1px solid black" | |
| − | {| | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Project !! Features: !! FOSS !! Tree !! XLinks !! LogProp | ! Project !! Features: !! FOSS !! Tree !! XLinks !! LogProp | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | [https://agora-2866.nodechef.com/forum Agora] | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | | align=center | YES | ||
| + | | align=center | YES | ||
| + | | align=center | no | ||
| + | | align=center | not yet | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [http://en.arguman.org/ Argüman] | | [http://en.arguman.org/ Argüman] | ||
| | | | ||
| − | | | + | | align=center | Y([https://github.com/arguman/arguman.org/blob/master/LICENSE MIT)] |
| − | | YES | + | | align=center | YES |
| − | | ? | + | | align=center | ? |
| − | | no | + | | align=center | no |
|- | |- | ||
| [http://www.argunet.org/working-with-argunet/ Argunet] | | [http://www.argunet.org/working-with-argunet/ Argunet] | ||
| | | | ||
| − | | [http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html cli:Y]/srv:? | + | | align=center | [http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html cli:Y]/srv:? |
|- | |- | ||
| [http://bcisiveonline.com/ bCisive Online] | | [http://bcisiveonline.com/ bCisive Online] | ||
| Line 36: | Line 51: | ||
| [[InstaGov/Debate Mapper]] | | [[InstaGov/Debate Mapper]] | ||
| | | | ||
| − | | YES | + | | align=center | YES |
| − | | YES | + | | align=center | YES |
| − | | UC | + | | align=center | UC |
| − | | YES | + | | align=center | YES |
|- | |- | ||
| [http://www.debate.fm/ Debate.fm] | | [http://www.debate.fm/ Debate.fm] | ||
| Line 45: | Line 60: | ||
| [http://debategraph.org/ Debategraph] | | [http://debategraph.org/ Debategraph] | ||
| | | | ||
| − | | no | + | | align=center | no |
|- | |- | ||
| [http://www.explore-ideas.com/ Explore-Ideas] | | [http://www.explore-ideas.com/ Explore-Ideas] | ||
| Line 61: | Line 76: | ||
Not software, but worth noting: {{l/wp|Flow (policy debate)}}, {{l/wp|Argumentation theory}} | Not software, but worth noting: {{l/wp|Flow (policy debate)}}, {{l/wp|Argumentation theory}} | ||
| + | ==Acknowledgements== | ||
| + | The list of software projects originally came from [http://wiki.lesswrong.com/wiki/Debate_tools LessWrong Wiki], which has been updated since HTYP last examined it closely. | ||
Latest revision as of 23:51, 3 September 2017
About
Debate mapping is an information management technique for keeping track of the structure of evidence and arguments in support of making the best determination about the truth or falsity of one or more statements. Although in theory this could be done using only paper or a manual filing system, it is far more effective when computers can be used to keep track of the current status of each statement, and when networks can be used to facilitate participation by multiple individuals.
|
This page is a seed article. You can help HTYP water it: make a request to expand a given page and/or donate to help give us more writing-hours!
|
Software
Note that many of these are just "debate software"; "debate mapping software" is a particular kind of debate software which includes, at a minimum, the "Tree" and "LogProp" features.
Blank cells indicate that we have not yet researched the project sufficiently to determine whether a feature is supported.
Feature key:
- FOSS = free, open-source (code is available to be integrated with other projects at no cost)
- Tree = supports display of logical dependencies as a tree structure
- XLinks = allows cross-linking of logical dependencies
- LogProp = tracks whether points have been refuted, and logically propagates the consequences up to the root
Status key:
- UC = under construction
| Project | Features: | FOSS | Tree | XLinks | LogProp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agora | YES | YES | no | not yet | |
| Argüman | Y(MIT) | YES | ? | no | |
| Argunet | cli:Y/srv:? | ||||
| bCisive Online | |||||
| Canonizer | |||||
| Cartargrapher | |||||
| InstaGov/Debate Mapper | YES | YES | UC | YES | |
| Debate.fm | |||||
| Debategraph | no | ||||
| Explore-Ideas | |||||
| MACOSPOL | |||||
| PyMC | |||||
| SAWM | |||||
| TakeOnIt |
- Argunet's client application is released under the Eclipse Public License Version 1.0
- Argunet also has a server component; it's not clear if that is even available for download.
Not software, but worth noting: Flow (policy debate), Argumentation theory
Acknowledgements
The list of software projects originally came from LessWrong Wiki, which has been updated since HTYP last examined it closely.