Difference between revisions of "debate mapping"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(list dump) |
(another related wikipedia article) |
||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
|} | |} | ||
| − | Not software, but worth noting: {{l/wp|Flow (policy debate)}} | + | Not software, but worth noting: {{l/wp|Flow (policy debate)}}, {{l/wp|Argumentation theory}} |
Revision as of 00:13, 6 October 2015
|
This page is a seed article. You can help HTYP water it: make a request to expand a given page and/or donate to help give us more writing-hours!
|
Software
list source: LessWrong Wiki
Feature key:
- FOSS = free, open-source (code is available to be integrated with other projects at no cost)
- Tree = supports display of logical dependencies as a tree structure
- XLinks = allows cross-linking of logical dependencies
- LogProp = tracks whether points have been refuted, and logically propagates the consequences up to the root
Status key:
- UC = under construction
Most of these are still being researched to see which features they support.
| Project | Features: | FOSS | Tree | XLinks | LogProp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Argunet | |||||
| bCisive Online | |||||
| Canonizer | |||||
| Cartargrapher | |||||
| InstaGov/Debate Mapper | YES | YES | UC | YES | |
| Debate.fm | |||||
| Debategraph | no | ||||
| Explore-Ideas | |||||
| MACOSPOL | |||||
| PyMC | |||||
| SAWM | |||||
| TakeOnIt |
Not software, but worth noting: Flow (policy debate), Argumentation theory