Difference between revisions of "video sharing"

from HTYP, the free directory anyone can edit if they can prove to me that they're not a spambot
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(spun stuff into separate pages; reorganized...)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Internet]]: [[video sharing]]
+
<hide>
 +
[[page type::article]]
 +
[[thing type::activity]]
 +
</hide>
 +
==About==
 +
'''Video sharing''' is the practice of uploading [[video file]]s for others to download and/or view. It is most commonly done via either of two primary methods: web uploads and [[BitTorrent]]s:
 +
* web uploads
 +
** proprietary {{l/sub|service}}s, mainly [[YouTube]]
 +
** open-source {{l/sub|software}}
 +
*** {{l/sub|federated}}: video-sharing software that federates between instances
 +
* [[BitTorrent]]s:
 +
** [[BitTorrent/sites|sites]]: torrent databases
 +
** specialized software:
 +
*** [[Miro Video Player]] ({{wikipedia|Miro (software)}}: seems to be abandonware since 2013)
 +
==Copyright Issues==
 +
Copyright is often a prickly issue, as many of the uploads are copyrighted material with some commercial value, typically (though not always) uploaded without permission from the copyright holder. Many copyright holders are increasingly patrolling video-sharing sites looking for their material, and typically will issue "take-down" orders for any material they believe to be excessive. (There is some controversy over whether some of these take-down orders are themselves ethical, such as videos of official presidential debates which arguably ought to be available to everyone.)
  
[[video sharing]] apparently refers to the practice of uploading video files for others to download and/or view.{{seed}}
+
The relationship between video-sharing sites and copyright holders has become increasingly complex.
==Note==
+
==Reviews==
It's not immediately clear how the issue of copyright is addressed, e.g. are uploaders presumed to be uploading material which they own the copyright (self-produced material) or else have the copyright holder's permission? I can't think that any high-visibility web site wouldn't take steps to prevent outright pirating... --[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 21:36, 10 April 2006 (EDT)
+
* [http://www.dvguru.com/2006/04/07/ten-video-sharing-services-compared/ Ten video sharing services compared] (at [http://www.dvguru.com/ DVguru]) ([[slashdot:06/04/09/0214227|Slashdot]])
==Sharing Sites==
+
==Related==
* [http://eyespot.com/ Eyespot]
+
* [[Internet video]]
* [http://video.google.com/ Google Video]
 
* [http://grouper.com/ Grouper]
 
* [http://jumpcut.com/ jumpcut]
 
* [http://ourmedia.org/ ourmedia]
 
* [http://revver.com/ revver]
 
* [http://videoegg.com/ VideoEgg]
 
* [http://vimeo.com/ vimeo]
 
* [http://vsocial.com/ vSocial]
 
* [http://youtube.com/ YouTube]
 
===Reviews===
 
* [http://www.dvguru.com/2006/04/07/ten-video-sharing-services-compared/ Ten video sharing services compared] (at [http://www.dvguru.com/ DVguru]) ([http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/04/09/0214227 Slashdot])
 

Latest revision as of 01:03, 8 September 2017

About

Video sharing is the practice of uploading video files for others to download and/or view. It is most commonly done via either of two primary methods: web uploads and BitTorrents:

Copyright Issues

Copyright is often a prickly issue, as many of the uploads are copyrighted material with some commercial value, typically (though not always) uploaded without permission from the copyright holder. Many copyright holders are increasingly patrolling video-sharing sites looking for their material, and typically will issue "take-down" orders for any material they believe to be excessive. (There is some controversy over whether some of these take-down orders are themselves ethical, such as videos of official presidential debates which arguably ought to be available to everyone.)

The relationship between video-sharing sites and copyright holders has become increasingly complex.

Reviews

Related