debate mapping - Revision history

Woozle: Agora; intro; improved formatting

2017-09-03T23:51:26Z

Agora; intro; improved formatting

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:51, 3 September 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
			<hide>
			[[page type::article]]
			[[thing type::technique]]
			</hide>
			==About==
			'''Debate mapping''' is an information management technique for keeping track of the structure of evidence and arguments in support of making the best determination about the truth or falsity of one or more statements. Although in theory this could be done using only paper or a manual filing system, it is far more effective when computers can be used to [[/status tracking\|keep track of the current status]] of each statement, and when networks can be used to facilitate participation by multiple individuals.
	{{seed}}		{{seed}}
	==Software==		==Software==
	~~''list source: [http://wiki~~.~~lesswrong~~.~~com/wiki/Debate_tools LessWrong Wiki]''~~
			Note that many of these are just "debate software"; "debate mapping software" is a particular kind of debate software which includes, at a minimum, the "Tree" and "LogProp" features.

			Blank cells indicate that we have not yet researched the project sufficiently to determine whether a feature is supported.

	Feature key:		Feature key:
Line 12:		Line 21:
	* UC = under construction		* UC = under construction

	~~Most of these are still being researched to see which features they support.~~		{\| border=1 style="border: 1px solid black"
	{\|
	\|-		\|-
	! Project !! Features: !! FOSS !! Tree !! XLinks !! LogProp		! Project !! Features: !! FOSS !! Tree !! XLinks !! LogProp
			\|-
			\| [https://agora-2866.nodechef.com/forum Agora]
			\|
			\| align=center \| YES
			\| align=center \| YES
			\| align=center \| no
			\| align=center \| not yet
	\|-		\|-
	\| [http://en.arguman.org/ Argüman]		\| [http://en.arguman.org/ Argüman]
	\|		\|
	\| Y([https://github.com/arguman/arguman.org/blob/master/LICENSE MIT)]		\| align=center \| Y([https://github.com/arguman/arguman.org/blob/master/LICENSE MIT)]
	\| YES		\| align=center \| YES
	\| ?		\| align=center \| ?
	\| no		\| align=center \| no
	\|-		\|-
	\| [http://www.argunet.org/working-with-argunet/ Argunet]		\| [http://www.argunet.org/working-with-argunet/ Argunet]
	\|		\|
	\| [http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html cli:Y]/srv:?		\| align=center \| [http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html cli:Y]/srv:?
	\|-		\|-
	\| [http://bcisiveonline.com/ bCisive Online]		\| [http://bcisiveonline.com/ bCisive Online]
Line 36:		Line 51:
	\| [[InstaGov/Debate Mapper]]		\| [[InstaGov/Debate Mapper]]
	\|		\|
	\| YES		\| align=center \| YES
	\| YES		\| align=center \| YES
	\| UC		\| align=center \| UC
	\| YES		\| align=center \| YES
	\|-		\|-
	\| [http://www.debate.fm/ Debate.fm]		\| [http://www.debate.fm/ Debate.fm]
Line 45:		Line 60:
	\| [http://debategraph.org/ Debategraph]		\| [http://debategraph.org/ Debategraph]
	\|		\|
	\| no		\| align=center \| no
	\|-		\|-
	\| [http://www.explore-ideas.com/ Explore-Ideas]		\| [http://www.explore-ideas.com/ Explore-Ideas]
Line 61:		Line 76:

	Not software, but worth noting: {{l/wp\|Flow (policy debate)}}, {{l/wp\|Argumentation theory}}		Not software, but worth noting: {{l/wp\|Flow (policy debate)}}, {{l/wp\|Argumentation theory}}
			==Acknowledgements==
			The list of software projects originally came from [http://wiki.lesswrong.com/wiki/Debate_tools LessWrong Wiki], which has been updated since HTYP last examined it closely.

Woozle: Arguman is FOSS

2015-10-18T15:54:43Z

Arguman *is* FOSS

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:54, 18 October 2015
Line 19:		Line 19:
	\| [http://en.arguman.org/ Argüman]		\| [http://en.arguman.org/ Argüman]
	\|		\|
	\| no		\| Y([https://github.com/arguman/arguman.org/blob/master/LICENSE MIT)]
	\| YES		\| YES
	\| ?		\| ?

Woozle: Arguman

2015-10-18T12:41:07Z

Arguman

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:41, 18 October 2015
Line 16:		Line 16:
	\|-		\|-
	! Project !! Features: !! FOSS !! Tree !! XLinks !! LogProp		! Project !! Features: !! FOSS !! Tree !! XLinks !! LogProp
			\|-
			\| [http://en.arguman.org/ Argüman]
			\|
			\| no
			\| YES
			\| ?
			\| no
	\|-		\|-
	\| [http://www.argunet.org/working-with-argunet/ Argunet]		\| [http://www.argunet.org/working-with-argunet/ Argunet]

Woozle: Argunet

2015-10-06T00:32:31Z

Argunet

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:32, 6 October 2015
Line 18:		Line 18:
	\|-		\|-
	\| [http://www.argunet.org/working-with-argunet/ Argunet]		\| [http://www.argunet.org/working-with-argunet/ Argunet]
			\|
			\| [http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html cli:Y]/srv:?
	\|-		\|-
	\| [http://bcisiveonline.com/ bCisive Online]		\| [http://bcisiveonline.com/ bCisive Online]
Line 48:		Line 50:
	\| [http://www.takeonit.com/ TakeOnIt]		\| [http://www.takeonit.com/ TakeOnIt]
	\|}		\|}
			* Argunet's ''client'' application is released under the [http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html Eclipse Public License Version 1.0]
			* Argunet also has a ''server'' component; it's not clear if that is even available for download.

	Not software, but worth noting: {{l/wp\|Flow (policy debate)}}, {{l/wp\|Argumentation theory}}		Not software, but worth noting: {{l/wp\|Flow (policy debate)}}, {{l/wp\|Argumentation theory}}

Woozle: another related wikipedia article

2015-10-06T00:13:25Z

another related wikipedia article

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:13, 6 October 2015
Line 49:		Line 49:
	\|}		\|}

	Not software, but worth noting: {{l/wp\|Flow (policy debate)}}		Not software, but worth noting: {{l/wp\|Flow (policy debate)}}, {{l/wp\|Argumentation theory}}

Woozle: list dump

2015-10-06T00:04:43Z

list dump

New page

{{seed}}
==Software==
''list source: [http://wiki.lesswrong.com/wiki/Debate_tools LessWrong Wiki]''

Feature key:
* FOSS = [[free, open-source]] (code is available to be integrated with other projects at no cost)
* Tree = supports display of logical dependencies as a tree structure
* XLinks = allows cross-linking of logical dependencies
* LogProp = tracks whether points have been refuted, and logically propagates the consequences up to the root

Status key:
* UC = under construction

Most of these are still being researched to see which features they support.
{|
|-
! Project !! Features: !! FOSS !! Tree !! XLinks !! LogProp
|-
| [http://www.argunet.org/working-with-argunet/ Argunet]
|-
| [http://bcisiveonline.com/ bCisive Online]
|-
| [http://canonizer.com/ Canonizer]
|-
| [http://cartargrapher.appspot.com/ Cartargrapher]
|-
| [[InstaGov/Debate Mapper]]
|
| YES
| YES
| UC
| YES
|-
| [http://www.debate.fm/ Debate.fm]
|-
| [http://debategraph.org/ Debategraph]
|
| no
|-
| [http://www.explore-ideas.com/ Explore-Ideas]
|-
| [http://www.demoscience.org/ MACOSPOL]
|-
| [http://code.google.com/p/pymc/ PyMC]
|-
| [http://projects.csail.mit.edu/worldview/ SAWM]
|-
| [http://www.takeonit.com/ TakeOnIt]
|}

Not software, but worth noting: {{l/wp|Flow (policy debate)}}