US/NC/Durham/neighborhoods/Pinecrest Road/parking - Revision history

Woozle: post-move tidying and other belated updates

2010-06-23T23:16:35Z

post-move tidying and other belated updates

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:16, 23 June 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~[[Pinecrest Road Neighborhood]]: [[Pinecrest north-side parking ban]]~~
	[[Image:2005-09-30 City of Durham re Pinecrest.web.png\|thumb\|right\|letter from the City of Durham]]		[[Image:2005-09-30 City of Durham re Pinecrest.web.png\|thumb\|right\|letter from the City of Durham]]
	==News & Events==		==News & Events==
	* '''2005-10-27''' meeting		* '''2005-10-27''' meeting
	** [[DFD Traffic Issues Criteria]]: sheet handed out at the meeting		** [[DFD Traffic Issues Criteria]]: sheet handed out at the meeting
	** Recording of the firestation meeting: [http://www.hypertwins.org/files/htyp/2005-10-27%20pinecrest%20firestation%20meeting.mp3 MP3] 15.4 MB / [http://www.hypertwins.org/files/htyp/2005-10-27%20pinecrest%20firestation%20meeting.ogg OGG] 10.2 MB		** Recording of the firestation meeting: <s>[http://www.hypertwins.org/files/htyp/2005-10-27%20pinecrest%20firestation%20meeting.mp3 MP3] 15.4 MB / [http://www.hypertwins.org/files/htyp/2005-10-27%20pinecrest%20firestation%20meeting.ogg OGG] 10.2 MB</s> ''These files are missing at the moment; apparently a complete recursive copy was using some strange new definition of "complete"...--[[User:Woozle\|Woozle]] 23:16, 23 June 2010 (UTC)''
	** '''Brief summary''': It appears that the issue has been resolved for now, with the fire department agreeing that self-policing seems to be working so far and is worth trying as a permanent solution. Cars should be parked as close to the curb as possible, and cars parked on opposite sides of the street should be staggered by at least 44 feet. A fire truck may need as much as 14 feet of width in order to pass comfortably; 12 feet is workable but tight, and significantly slows down response time. Having one side of the street designated a "no parking" area would ''not'', however, hamper the street's qualifications for speed hump installation at a later date; more likely it would increase the average traffic speed, which would if anything increase the street's qualification. There is no such thing as designating a street to be an "emergency access route", as some residents (favoring the ban and opposed to speed humps) have apparently requested (see public records images). The issue of speed humps was also discussed; I have created a page for the latest status on that issue: [[Pinecrest Speed Humps]]		** '''Brief summary''': It appears that the issue has been resolved for now, with the fire department agreeing that self-policing seems to be working so far and is worth trying as a permanent solution. Cars should be parked as close to the curb as possible, and cars parked on opposite sides of the street should be staggered by at least 44 feet. A fire truck may need as much as 14 feet of width in order to pass comfortably; 12 feet is workable but tight, and significantly slows down response time. Having one side of the street designated a "no parking" area would ''not'', however, hamper the street's qualifications for speed hump installation at a later date; more likely it would increase the average traffic speed, which would if anything increase the street's qualification. There is no such thing as designating a street to be an "emergency access route", as some residents (favoring the ban and opposed to speed humps) have apparently requested (see public records images). The issue of speed humps was also discussed; I have created a page for the latest status on that issue: [[Pinecrest Speed Humps]]
	* '''2005-10-01''' The City of Durham says they will soon be forbidding parking on the north side of old Pinecrest, in an effort to allow fire engines to get through faster. (This will also no doubt aid the many morning commuters, who also use Pinecrest as the fastest route between Point A and Point B, to get to their respective fires.) Should we start an online petition about this? Some pictures showing the available space in the road (hover over thumbnails to see caption; click on thumbnail for larger picture):		* '''2005-10-01''' The City of Durham says they will soon be forbidding parking on the north side of old Pinecrest, in an effort to allow fire engines to get through faster. (This will also no doubt aid the many morning commuters, who also use Pinecrest as the fastest route between Point A and Point B, to get to their respective fires.) Should we start an online petition about this? Some pictures showing the available space in the road (hover over thumbnails to see caption; click on thumbnail for larger picture):
Line 16:		Line 15:
	Of particular interest to readers are the dates on these records; take note of which dates were added by computers and which were added by people.		Of particular interest to readers are the dates on these records; take note of which dates were added by computers and which were added by people.

	[[Image:~~pubrec_parking_1~~.png\|200px\|Cover Letter]][[Image:~~pubrec_parking_2~~.png\|200px\|Updated computer log]][[Image:~~pubrec_parking_3~~.png\|200px\|Updated computer log, page 2]][[Image:~~pubrec_parking_4~~.png\|200px\|Original computer log with handwritten annotations]][[Image:~~pubrec_parking_5~~.png\|200px\|Street and area map]][[Image:~~pubrec_parking_6~~.png\|200px\|Letter that was sent to residents]][[Image:~~pubrec_parking_7~~.png\|200px\|GIS Request 1, page 1]][[Image:~~pubrec_parking_8~~.png\|200px\|GIS Request 1, page 2]][[Image:~~pubrec_parking_9~~.png\|200px\|GIS Request 2, page 1]][[Image:~~pubrec_parking_10~~.png\|200px\|GIS Request 2, page 2]][[Image:~~pubrec_parking_11~~.png\|200px\|GIS Request 3, page 1]][[Image:~~pubrec_parking_12~~.png\|200px\|GIS Request 3, page 2]][[Image:~~pubrec_parking_13~~.png\|200px\|Lengthy e-mail conversation about public records]][[Image:~~pubrec_parking_14~~.png\|200px\|Lengthy e-mail conversation about public records, page 2]][[Image:~~pubrec_parking_15~~.png\|200px\|Brief e-mail conversation about speed humps]][[Image:~~pubrec_parking_16~~.png\|200px\|Work order for "No Trucks" signs]]		[[Image:Pubrec_parking_1.png\|200px\|Cover Letter]][[Image:Pubrec_parking_2.png\|200px\|Updated computer log]][[Image:Pubrec_parking_3.png\|200px\|Updated computer log, page 2]][[Image:Pubrec_parking_4.png\|200px\|Original computer log with handwritten annotations]][[Image:Pubrec_parking_5.png\|200px\|Street and area map]][[Image:Pubrec_parking_6.png\|200px\|Letter that was sent to residents]][[Image:Pubrec_parking_7.png\|200px\|GIS Request 1, page 1]][[Image:Pubrec_parking_8.png\|200px\|GIS Request 1, page 2]][[Image:Pubrec_parking_9.png\|200px\|GIS Request 2, page 1]][[Image:Pubrec_parking_10.png\|200px\|GIS Request 2, page 2]][[Image:Pubrec_parking_11.png\|200px\|GIS Request 3, page 1]][[Image:Pubrec_parking_12.png\|200px\|GIS Request 3, page 2]][[Image:Pubrec_parking_13.png\|200px\|Lengthy e-mail conversation about public records]][[Image:Pubrec_parking_14.png\|200px\|Lengthy e-mail conversation about public records, page 2]][[Image:Pubrec_parking_15.png\|200px\|Brief e-mail conversation about speed humps]][[Image:Pubrec_parking_16.png\|200px\|Work order for "No Trucks" signs]]

	==Related Issues==		==Related Issues==
	* [[~~Pinecrest Speed Humps~~]]		* [[../speed humps\|speed humps]]

Woozle: moved Pinecrest north-side parking ban to US/NC/Durham/neighborhoods/Pinecrest Road/parking: reorganization

2010-06-23T22:58:29Z

moved Pinecrest north-side parking ban to US/NC/Durham/neighborhoods/Pinecrest Road/parking: reorganization

← Older revision	Revision as of 22:58, 23 June 2010
(No difference)

Woozle: /* News & Events */ link to new speed humps page

2005-10-28T19:47:45Z

News & Events: link to new speed humps page

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:47, 28 October 2005
Line 5:		Line 5:
	** [[DFD Traffic Issues Criteria]]: sheet handed out at the meeting		** [[DFD Traffic Issues Criteria]]: sheet handed out at the meeting
	** Recording of the firestation meeting: [http://www.hypertwins.org/files/htyp/2005-10-27%20pinecrest%20firestation%20meeting.mp3 MP3] 15.4 MB / [http://www.hypertwins.org/files/htyp/2005-10-27%20pinecrest%20firestation%20meeting.ogg OGG] 10.2 MB		** Recording of the firestation meeting: [http://www.hypertwins.org/files/htyp/2005-10-27%20pinecrest%20firestation%20meeting.mp3 MP3] 15.4 MB / [http://www.hypertwins.org/files/htyp/2005-10-27%20pinecrest%20firestation%20meeting.ogg OGG] 10.2 MB
	** '''Brief summary''': It appears that the issue has been resolved for now, with the fire department agreeing that self-policing seems to be working so far and is worth trying as a permanent solution. Cars should be parked as close to the curb as possible, and cars parked on opposite sides of the street should be staggered by at least 44 feet. A fire truck may need as much as 14 feet of width in order to pass comfortably; 12 feet is workable but tight, and significantly slows down response time. Having one side of the street designated a "no parking" area would ''not'', however, hamper the street's qualifications for speed hump installation at a later date; more likely it would increase the average traffic speed, which would if anything increase the street's qualification. There is no such thing as designating a street to be an "emergency access route", as some residents (favoring the ban and opposed to speed humps) have apparently requested (see public records images).		** '''Brief summary''': It appears that the issue has been resolved for now, with the fire department agreeing that self-policing seems to be working so far and is worth trying as a permanent solution. Cars should be parked as close to the curb as possible, and cars parked on opposite sides of the street should be staggered by at least 44 feet. A fire truck may need as much as 14 feet of width in order to pass comfortably; 12 feet is workable but tight, and significantly slows down response time. Having one side of the street designated a "no parking" area would ''not'', however, hamper the street's qualifications for speed hump installation at a later date; more likely it would increase the average traffic speed, which would if anything increase the street's qualification. There is no such thing as designating a street to be an "emergency access route", as some residents (favoring the ban and opposed to speed humps) have apparently requested (see public records images). The issue of speed humps was also discussed; I have created a page for the latest status on that issue: [[Pinecrest Speed Humps]]
	* '''2005-10-01''' The City of Durham says they will soon be forbidding parking on the north side of old Pinecrest, in an effort to allow fire engines to get through faster. (This will also no doubt aid the many morning commuters, who also use Pinecrest as the fastest route between Point A and Point B, to get to their respective fires.) Should we start an online petition about this? Some pictures showing the available space in the road (hover over thumbnails to see caption; click on thumbnail for larger picture):		* '''2005-10-01''' The City of Durham says they will soon be forbidding parking on the north side of old Pinecrest, in an effort to allow fire engines to get through faster. (This will also no doubt aid the many morning commuters, who also use Pinecrest as the fastest route between Point A and Point B, to get to their respective fires.) Should we start an online petition about this? Some pictures showing the available space in the road (hover over thumbnails to see caption; click on thumbnail for larger picture):
	[[Image:PA030001 opposing cars on pinecrest.jpg\|200px\|Two cars, parked opposite each other on the Academy-Dogwood section of Pinecrest Road]]		[[Image:PA030001 opposing cars on pinecrest.jpg\|200px\|Two cars, parked opposite each other on the Academy-Dogwood section of Pinecrest Road]]
	[[Image:PA030002 tape measure crossing street.jpg\|200px\|Tape measure crossing between the two cars, showing the whole tape measure and a distance of at least 11'4"]]		[[Image:PA030002 tape measure crossing street.jpg\|200px\|Tape measure crossing between the two cars, showing the whole tape measure and a distance of at least 11'4"]]
	[[Image:PA030003 tape measure at car.jpg\|200px\|Tape measure at right-hand car, showing that the distance is closer to 12 feet]]		[[Image:PA030003 tape measure at car.jpg\|200px\|Tape measure at right-hand car, showing that the distance is closer to 12 feet]]

	==Public Records Request==		==Public Records Request==
	After an NC Public Records request, the following information was received, including a copy of the initial request. I have included all pages, many of which are from the Durham GIS - and somewhat outdated at that. I did not attempt OCR specifically so this public-but-personal information is not easily used for nefarious purposes. The 16 pages linked here comprise the entirety of the public records supplied, though astute observers may note other undocumented references.		After an NC Public Records request, the following information was received, including a copy of the initial request. I have included all pages, many of which are from the Durham GIS - and somewhat outdated at that. I did not attempt OCR specifically so this public-but-personal information is not easily used for nefarious purposes. The 16 pages linked here comprise the entirety of the public records supplied, though astute observers may note other undocumented references.

Woozle: /* Related Issues */ link to speed humps article (to be written)

2005-10-28T19:03:53Z

Related Issues: link to speed humps article (to be written)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:03, 28 October 2005
Line 18:		Line 18:

	==Related Issues==		==Related Issues==
	* ~~What ever happened to speed humps? I gather that the current obstacle is funding. How do we keep updated on this so that we will have a petition ready when there's funding again?~~		* [[Pinecrest Speed Humps]]

Woozle: link to DFD criteria sheet; brief summary

2005-10-28T13:40:04Z

link to DFD criteria sheet; brief summary

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:40, 28 October 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Pinecrest Road Neighborhood]]: [[Pinecrest north-side parking ban]]		[[Pinecrest Road Neighborhood]]: [[Pinecrest north-side parking ban]]
	[[Image:2005-09-30 City of Durham re Pinecrest.web.png\|thumb\|right\|letter from the City of Durham]]		[[Image:2005-09-30 City of Durham re Pinecrest.web.png\|thumb\|right\|letter from the City of Durham]]
	* '''2005-10-27''' Recording of the firestation meeting: [http://www.hypertwins.org/files/htyp/2005-10-27%20pinecrest%20firestation%20meeting.mp3 MP3] 15.4 MB / [http://www.hypertwins.org/files/htyp/2005-10-27%20pinecrest%20firestation%20meeting.ogg OGG] 10.2 MB		==News & Events==
			* '''2005-10-27''' meeting
			** [[DFD Traffic Issues Criteria]]: sheet handed out at the meeting
			** Recording of the firestation meeting: [http://www.hypertwins.org/files/htyp/2005-10-27%20pinecrest%20firestation%20meeting.mp3 MP3] 15.4 MB / [http://www.hypertwins.org/files/htyp/2005-10-27%20pinecrest%20firestation%20meeting.ogg OGG] 10.2 MB
			** '''Brief summary''': It appears that the issue has been resolved for now, with the fire department agreeing that self-policing seems to be working so far and is worth trying as a permanent solution. Cars should be parked as close to the curb as possible, and cars parked on opposite sides of the street should be staggered by at least 44 feet. A fire truck may need as much as 14 feet of width in order to pass comfortably; 12 feet is workable but tight, and significantly slows down response time. Having one side of the street designated a "no parking" area would ''not'', however, hamper the street's qualifications for speed hump installation at a later date; more likely it would increase the average traffic speed, which would if anything increase the street's qualification. There is no such thing as designating a street to be an "emergency access route", as some residents (favoring the ban and opposed to speed humps) have apparently requested (see public records images).
	* '''2005-10-01''' The City of Durham says they will soon be forbidding parking on the north side of old Pinecrest, in an effort to allow fire engines to get through faster. (This will also no doubt aid the many morning commuters, who also use Pinecrest as the fastest route between Point A and Point B, to get to their respective fires.) Should we start an online petition about this? Some pictures showing the available space in the road (hover over thumbnails to see caption; click on thumbnail for larger picture):		* '''2005-10-01''' The City of Durham says they will soon be forbidding parking on the north side of old Pinecrest, in an effort to allow fire engines to get through faster. (This will also no doubt aid the many morning commuters, who also use Pinecrest as the fastest route between Point A and Point B, to get to their respective fires.) Should we start an online petition about this? Some pictures showing the available space in the road (hover over thumbnails to see caption; click on thumbnail for larger picture):
	[[Image:PA030001 opposing cars on pinecrest.jpg\|200px\|Two cars, parked opposite each other on the Academy-Dogwood section of Pinecrest Road]]		[[Image:PA030001 opposing cars on pinecrest.jpg\|200px\|Two cars, parked opposite each other on the Academy-Dogwood section of Pinecrest Road]]

Woozle: recording links

2005-10-28T10:59:59Z

recording links

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:59, 28 October 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Pinecrest Road Neighborhood]]: [[Pinecrest north-side parking ban]]		[[Pinecrest Road Neighborhood]]: [[Pinecrest north-side parking ban]]
	[[Image:2005-09-30 City of Durham re Pinecrest.web.png\|thumb\|right\|letter from the City of Durham]]		[[Image:2005-09-30 City of Durham re Pinecrest.web.png\|thumb\|right\|letter from the City of Durham]]
	* '''2005-10-27''' ~~MEETING TONIGHT at 6~~:~~30 PM in fire station #5 on Chapel Hill Road to discuss the potential parking signs with the acting fire chief~~. ~~All interested residents and owners should consider coming, as this may be the last chance to set things going in a direction that will cause the least unhappiness~~.		* '''2005-10-27''' Recording of the firestation meeting: [http://www.hypertwins.org/files/htyp/2005-10-27%20pinecrest%20firestation%20meeting.mp3 MP3] 15.4 MB / [http://www.hypertwins.org/files/htyp/2005-10-27%20pinecrest%20firestation%20meeting.ogg OGG] 10.2 MB
	* '''2005-10-01''' The City of Durham says they will soon be forbidding parking on the north side of old Pinecrest, in an effort to allow fire engines to get through faster. (This will also no doubt aid the many morning commuters, who also use Pinecrest as the fastest route between Point A and Point B, to get to their respective fires.) Should we start an online petition about this? Some pictures showing the available space in the road (hover over thumbnails to see caption; click on thumbnail for larger picture):		* '''2005-10-01''' The City of Durham says they will soon be forbidding parking on the north side of old Pinecrest, in an effort to allow fire engines to get through faster. (This will also no doubt aid the many morning commuters, who also use Pinecrest as the fastest route between Point A and Point B, to get to their respective fires.) Should we start an online petition about this? Some pictures showing the available space in the road (hover over thumbnails to see caption; click on thumbnail for larger picture):
	[[Image:PA030001 opposing cars on pinecrest.jpg\|200px\|Two cars, parked opposite each other on the Academy-Dogwood section of Pinecrest Road]]		[[Image:PA030001 opposing cars on pinecrest.jpg\|200px\|Two cars, parked opposite each other on the Academy-Dogwood section of Pinecrest Road]]

Woozle: 10/27 meeting

2005-10-27T11:14:59Z

10/27 meeting

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:14, 27 October 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Pinecrest Road Neighborhood]]: [[Pinecrest north-side parking ban]]		[[Pinecrest Road Neighborhood]]: [[Pinecrest north-side parking ban]]
	[[Image:2005-09-30 City of Durham re Pinecrest.web.png\|thumb\|right\|letter from the City of Durham]]		[[Image:2005-09-30 City of Durham re Pinecrest.web.png\|thumb\|right\|letter from the City of Durham]]
			* '''2005-10-27''' MEETING TONIGHT at 6:30 PM in fire station #5 on Chapel Hill Road to discuss the potential parking signs with the acting fire chief. All interested residents and owners should consider coming, as this may be the last chance to set things going in a direction that will cause the least unhappiness.
	* '''2005-10-01''' The City of Durham says they will soon be forbidding parking on the north side of old Pinecrest, in an effort to allow fire engines to get through faster. (This will also no doubt aid the many morning commuters, who also use Pinecrest as the fastest route between Point A and Point B, to get to their respective fires.) Should we start an online petition about this? Some pictures showing the available space in the road (hover over thumbnails to see caption; click on thumbnail for larger picture):		* '''2005-10-01''' The City of Durham says they will soon be forbidding parking on the north side of old Pinecrest, in an effort to allow fire engines to get through faster. (This will also no doubt aid the many morning commuters, who also use Pinecrest as the fastest route between Point A and Point B, to get to their respective fires.) Should we start an online petition about this? Some pictures showing the available space in the road (hover over thumbnails to see caption; click on thumbnail for larger picture):
	[[Image:PA030001 opposing cars on pinecrest.jpg\|200px\|Two cars, parked opposite each other on the Academy-Dogwood section of Pinecrest Road]]		[[Image:PA030001 opposing cars on pinecrest.jpg\|200px\|Two cars, parked opposite each other on the Academy-Dogwood section of Pinecrest Road]]

Tdcrone: /* Public Records Request */ Rest of the ALT tags

2005-10-23T18:38:54Z

Public Records Request: Rest of the ALT tags

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:38, 23 October 2005
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Of particular interest to readers are the dates on these records; take note of which dates were added by computers and which were added by people.		Of particular interest to readers are the dates on these records; take note of which dates were added by computers and which were added by people.

	[[Image:pubrec_parking_1.png\|200px\|Cover Letter]][[Image:pubrec_parking_2.png\|200px\|Updated computer log]][[Image:pubrec_parking_3.png\|200px\|Updated computer log, page 2]][[Image:pubrec_parking_4.png\|200px\|Original computer log with handwritten annotations]][[Image:pubrec_parking_5.png\|200px\|Street and area map]][[Image:pubrec_parking_6.png\|200px\|Letter that was sent to residents]][[Image:pubrec_parking_7.png\|200px\|GIS Request 1, page 1]][[Image:pubrec_parking_8.png\|200px\|GIS Request 1, page 2]][[Image:pubrec_parking_9.png\|200px\|GIS Request 2, page 1]][[Image:pubrec_parking_10.png\|200px\|GIS Request 2, page 2]][[Image:pubrec_parking_11.png\|200px\|GIS Request 3, page 1]][[Image:pubrec_parking_12.png\|200px\|GIS Request 3, page 2]][[Image:pubrec_parking_13.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_14.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_15.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_16.png\|200px]]		[[Image:pubrec_parking_1.png\|200px\|Cover Letter]][[Image:pubrec_parking_2.png\|200px\|Updated computer log]][[Image:pubrec_parking_3.png\|200px\|Updated computer log, page 2]][[Image:pubrec_parking_4.png\|200px\|Original computer log with handwritten annotations]][[Image:pubrec_parking_5.png\|200px\|Street and area map]][[Image:pubrec_parking_6.png\|200px\|Letter that was sent to residents]][[Image:pubrec_parking_7.png\|200px\|GIS Request 1, page 1]][[Image:pubrec_parking_8.png\|200px\|GIS Request 1, page 2]][[Image:pubrec_parking_9.png\|200px\|GIS Request 2, page 1]][[Image:pubrec_parking_10.png\|200px\|GIS Request 2, page 2]][[Image:pubrec_parking_11.png\|200px\|GIS Request 3, page 1]][[Image:pubrec_parking_12.png\|200px\|GIS Request 3, page 2]][[Image:pubrec_parking_13.png\|200px\|Lengthy e-mail conversation about public records]][[Image:pubrec_parking_14.png\|200px\|Lengthy e-mail conversation about public records, page 2]][[Image:pubrec_parking_15.png\|200px\|Brief e-mail conversation about speed humps]][[Image:pubrec_parking_16.png\|200px\|Work order for "No Trucks" signs]]

	==Related Issues==		==Related Issues==
	* What ever happened to speed humps? I gather that the current obstacle is funding. How do we keep updated on this so that we will have a petition ready when there's funding again?		* What ever happened to speed humps? I gather that the current obstacle is funding. How do we keep updated on this so that we will have a petition ready when there's funding again?

Tdcrone: /* Public Records Request */ ALT tags for images

2005-10-23T18:35:37Z

Public Records Request: ALT tags for images

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:35, 23 October 2005
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Of particular interest to readers are the dates on these records; take note of which dates were added by computers and which were added by people.		Of particular interest to readers are the dates on these records; take note of which dates were added by computers and which were added by people.

	[[Image:pubrec_parking_1.png\|200px\|Cover Letter]][[Image:pubrec_parking_2.png\|200px\|Updated computer log]][[Image:pubrec_parking_3.png\|200px\|Updated computer log, page 2]][[Image:pubrec_parking_4.png\|200px\|Original computer log with handwritten annotations]][[Image:pubrec_parking_5.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_6.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_7.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_8.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_9.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_10.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_11.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_12.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_13.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_14.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_15.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_16.png\|200px]]		[[Image:pubrec_parking_1.png\|200px\|Cover Letter]][[Image:pubrec_parking_2.png\|200px\|Updated computer log]][[Image:pubrec_parking_3.png\|200px\|Updated computer log, page 2]][[Image:pubrec_parking_4.png\|200px\|Original computer log with handwritten annotations]][[Image:pubrec_parking_5.png\|200px\|Street and area map]][[Image:pubrec_parking_6.png\|200px\|Letter that was sent to residents]][[Image:pubrec_parking_7.png\|200px\|GIS Request 1, page 1]][[Image:pubrec_parking_8.png\|200px\|GIS Request 1, page 2]][[Image:pubrec_parking_9.png\|200px\|GIS Request 2, page 1]][[Image:pubrec_parking_10.png\|200px\|GIS Request 2, page 2]][[Image:pubrec_parking_11.png\|200px\|GIS Request 3, page 1]][[Image:pubrec_parking_12.png\|200px\|GIS Request 3, page 2]][[Image:pubrec_parking_13.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_14.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_15.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_16.png\|200px]]

	==Related Issues==		==Related Issues==
	* What ever happened to speed humps? I gather that the current obstacle is funding. How do we keep updated on this so that we will have a petition ready when there's funding again?		* What ever happened to speed humps? I gather that the current obstacle is funding. How do we keep updated on this so that we will have a petition ready when there's funding again?

Tdcrone: /* Public Records Request */

2005-10-23T18:33:30Z

Public Records Request

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:33, 23 October 2005
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Of particular interest to readers are the dates on these records; take note of which dates were added by computers and which were added by people.		Of particular interest to readers are the dates on these records; take note of which dates were added by computers and which were added by people.

	[[Image:pubrec_parking_1.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_2.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_3.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_4.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_5.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_6.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_7.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_8.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_9.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_10.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_11.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_12.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_13.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_14.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_15.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_16.png\|200px]]		[[Image:pubrec_parking_1.png\|200px\|Cover Letter]][[Image:pubrec_parking_2.png\|200px\|Updated computer log]][[Image:pubrec_parking_3.png\|200px\|Updated computer log, page 2]][[Image:pubrec_parking_4.png\|200px\|Original computer log with handwritten annotations]][[Image:pubrec_parking_5.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_6.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_7.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_8.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_9.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_10.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_11.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_12.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_13.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_14.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_15.png\|200px]][[Image:pubrec_parking_16.png\|200px]]

	==Related Issues==		==Related Issues==
	* What ever happened to speed humps? I gather that the current obstacle is funding. How do we keep updated on this so that we will have a petition ready when there's funding again?		* What ever happened to speed humps? I gather that the current obstacle is funding. How do we keep updated on this so that we will have a petition ready when there's funding again?